Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Administrative Law Outline

Law Outlines > Administrative Law Outlines

This is an extract of our Administrative Law document, which we sell as part of our Administrative Law Outlines collection written by the top tier of Seton Hall Law School students.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Administrative Law Outlines. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Administrative Law Outline

I. Legislative Control of Administrative Agencies a. Five Components that Make Agency Law i. The US Constitution ii. The APA
iii. The Enabling Act of the Agency /Organic Act

1. Legislature must a. Assign the agency Mission b. Define agency structure i. Cabinet level ii. Freestanding iii. Independent

1. Multimember Commission

2. Small Bureaucracy iv. Agency's placement within the existing government iv. Other Federal Statutes governing general agency action v. Common Law b. Go back and look at Fox Pages 1-11 c. The Administrative Process i. Generally - Governed by the APA and Enabling act and each agency may have various ways for handling each problem it is therefore important not to over generalize.

1. Three Main Constructs of Agency Decision Making a. Rulemaking - Here the agency is completing a semi-legislative function i. Informal Rule Making - Notice and Comment: when the agency calls for comment on a proposed rule and then formalizes the rule basis upon the comments

1. APA 553 b. Adjudication/ Formal Rule Making - a process of having a hearing to which evidence is heard or admitted and a final rule is issued.
i. Often does not have Fed. Rul. Civ. Pro.
ii. APA 556 and 557 iii. Agency statute may require formal rule making on some issues but allow notice and comment in other situations

1|Page Administrative Law Outline

II. iv. Requires

1. An action like a civil trial with oral hearing and direct/cross examinations

2. Testimony is made under oath

3. Complete and exclusive record

4. Neutral presiding officer (often an admin law judge)

5. However does not have many requirements of evidentiary rules nor is there must pre/post trial procedures available.
c. Informal Agency Action - This occurs when the agency takes positions during individual matters and applies a standard that it had not previously promulgated. Then trying to substantiate that position upon appeal or judicial review i. Example: Denying every application for SS benefits to lefties.
ii. Often called the dark matter of administrative law iii. Minimal requirements for reasoning iv. Informal

2. Alternative Dispute Resolution - Commonly called Negotiated Rulemaking a. The representatives of an impacted group get together with the agency and negotiated the terms of a proposed rule prior to its publication in the Federal Register.
ii. Mechanisms of Administration

1. Agency does the work itself

2. License other to complete actions

3. Regulates an industry a. Justifications for Regulation (Stephen Byer)
i. Control Monopoly power ii. Control excess profits iii. Compensate for externalities iv. Compensate for inadequate information v. Inhibit excessive competition vi. Compensate for unequal bargaining power

4. Registers and Monitors actions

5. Gathers information
Legislative Control of Administrative Agencies - The Nondelegation Doctrine

2|Page Administrative Law Outline

a. From the Constitution i. Article I §1 provides that all legislative powers are vested in congress ii. Article I §8 the necessary and proper clause - states that congress may make laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution.
iii. In other words while congress has the only authority to make laws they have the right to make laws required to enact the laws the limitation is called the Nondelegation Doctrine.
b. Nondelegation Doctrine i. Filling Up the Details - Congress in several cases was allowed to assign the president authority in several matters when he was merely "Filling up the details" by applying one of several standards as the facts allowed.

1. Wayman v. Southard (pg. 24 Fox)
a. Court recognized that congress could not by itself perform every aspect of government. For example the treasury had been in place since before the Constitution.
b. This is the first case that provided the "filling up the details" once congress had established the general regulatory scheme is permissible.

2. Field v. Clark (1892 pg. 16 Clark)
a. The President was granted the power to remove or suspend "favorable international tariff rates"
in the event that the other country did not reciprocate in lowering theirs.
b. That congress cannot delegate legislative power…is a principle universally recognized as vital to the integrity and maintenance of the system of government ordained by the Constitution. The
Nondelegation doctrine is the recognition of this principle.
c. Statute upheld because the authority was only authorized to make a determination of fact.
i. Were the other countries tariffs lowered?

1. If yes, then the lower US rate/rules would apply

2. If not, then the old rules and rates would apply.
d. Therefore the legislative power had not been transferred only the right to Fill Up the Rules established by Congress. They could determine what was or was not in compliance with the tariff law on its own authority.
ii. Intelligible Principle Test

1. Hampton and Co. v. US (pg. 17 Cass)
a. Established that the president was authorized to make rules of tariffs to equalize the production of certain items with that of the US.

3|Page Administrative Law Outline

b. TO be valid Congress must i. Lay down by legislative act an INTELLIGIBLE PREINCIPLE to which the person or body authorized to fix such rates is directed to conform.
c. Congress could not have the specific knowledge and experience to handle in a timely fashion such a complex matter and therefore it was a valid exercise of their authority because the agency was bound by the rules of the enabling act.
iii. The New Deal Cases (National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 aka the NIRA)

1. Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan -
a. An oil refining portion of the NIRA that provided the government may inhibit the interstate commerce of any refinery or drilling company that extracted oil in excess of their respective state limits under Section (.
b. Court struck down because congress failed to provide guidelines, criteria, or requirement of findings to validate compliance with state laws that the president must operate within. Therefore the president had almost unlimited authority to deny interstate commerce rights to an entity and that goes too far i. Cardozo dissent: the stated purpose to conserve natural resources is enough and the president acts based on an objective study typical and classic form from Field or
Hampton Cases.

2. Schechter Poultry v. US -
a. The NIRA allowed the president to make laws for the fair competition at the recommendation of trade associations. In the case at hand, Roosevelt approved suggestions including wage, labor hours, and pricing minimums.
i. Was a private group setting standards for an industry with no inequitable restrictions on membership and the regulations were far broader than just reviewing industry for monopoly or safety practices.
b. The court found this went too far because the agency was able to take any and all powers previously vested in congress and the state legislature like wages. This was too legislative and far reaching.

3. Carter v. Carter Coal a. Court struck down an act which would provide that local coal producers could elect a board to establish the minimum price of coal in a district.

4|Page Administrative Law Outline

b. This was a delegation of legislative authority in the most obnoxious form because it is not to an official body but a private person whose interest may be and often are adverse to the interests of others in the same business.

4. Industrial Union Dep. AFL-CIL v. American Petroleum Institute (aka the Benzene Case)
a. Limited the Ability for OSHA to prescribe occupational health and safety standards only to
SIGNIFICANT RISK
b. Rehnquist Concurrence i. It was unconstitutional under Nondelegation authority because it failed to ensure

1. That important choices of social policy are made by congress, the branch most responsive to popular will

2. To provide an intelligible principle to guide acts exercise of delegated discretion

3. To enable courts to test that exercise against an ascertainable standard.

5. American Textile v. Donovan a. The secretary must only find significant risk, once that has occurred there is no need to review the cost benefit analysis of any regulation or rule.
iv. Delegation Since the New Deal

1. Whitman v. American Trucking Association a. The court found that the EPA was allowed to regulate the emissions of automobiles but it was limited to reason and science. More is bad less is better approach to pollution is not enough there must be a scientific reason to support any changes to the current regulations as promulgated.

2. Brown v. Sygar a. Congress gave the Comptroller powers of review over the President's proposed budget.
b. The president could appoint the person but only congress could remove the Comptroller and therefore it amounted to a legislative veto which is not allowed or an improper delegation of authority because it delegated the president's powers and not that of congress.
c. Solving a Delegation Problem i. Two Part Review of a Statute See fox pg. 32

1. What is the standard in the Statute?
a. Five Common levels i. Public convenience and necessity

5|Page Administrative Law Outline

1. Federal Marine Commission ii. Unfair methods of trade or competition

1. FTC
iii. National security (oil imports)

1. Energy Department iv. Protect health to the extent reasonable

1. OSHA
v. Protect human health and environment to an adequate degree of safety

1. EPA
b. If the court does not find any of these then Panama and Schechter will make the statute void c. Most modern courts will bend over backward to find some standard like Cardozo in his Panama
Dissent

2. To whom is the decision making power given?
a. The President or principal officers i. Okay b. Subsequent Delegation within the agency i. Aka subdelegation ii. Okay c. Private Entities or entities in another branch of government i. If setting policy

1. Schechter and Cater coal will basically call it an obnoxious use of authority and strike it down ii. If applying a policy standard to a set of facts

1. Schweiker and Thomas Cases a. Schweiker: the private sector are not making the policy they are simply applying the policy to individual disputes i. A case about allowing insurance companies to review if a person was eligible for Medicare. The Health and Human Services were setting standards of who qualified the company was merely gathering facts to see if the person did in fact qualify.

6|Page Administrative Law Outline

b. Thomas: use of private sector arbiters to render decisions on FIFRA and the use of pesticides. Okay because the use of ADR is a popular method of resolving disputes and here they were merely applying the law and standards to a case.
d. Subdelegation to a subordinate v. an outsider i. US Telecom Assn. v. FCC

1. Delegation to a subordinate within the agency is valid unless congress specifically suspends that right.

2. Delegation to an outsider is only okay if a. Establishing a reasonable condition for granting federal approval b. Gathering facts c. Giving advice.

3. In the case the FCC granted to local public utility boards the authority to determine if an exception to an FCC telecommunication rule applied. This was too great of authority and was therefore invalid.
ii. State Delegation and Review by local Judiciary

1. The state court's tend to be harder on the local legislature than that of the supreme court is on congress but will still try to uphold all but the most ridicules laws that provide the right to regulate but fail to establish when, where, and how it is to be accomplished.

2. These judges are normally elected and are more hands on in the legislative process

3. Also they will tend to rely on the judicial review to ensure that there is no abuse of digression even when an issue of vagueness applies a. see quote on top of pg 32 in fox d. Other Legislative Controls i. Congressional Devices for Policy Administrative Agencies

1. Congress can right lengthy enabling acts prescribing the behavior of the agency.
a. Nondelegation arises only when congress puts in the most minimal of guidance

2. The enabling act can prescribe the qualifications as to whom may hold certain positions in an agency

3. May incorporate a sun setting provision in which the agency is destroyed unless additional legislation is passed to keep the agency going a. Much more common in state agencies.

7|Page

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Administrative Law Outlines.

More Administrative Law Samples