Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Controlling Stockholder’s Fiduciary Obligations Outline

Law Outlines > Business Association (Duke Cox) Outlines

This is an extract of our Controlling Stockholder’s Fiduciary Obligations document, which we sell as part of our Business Association (Duke Cox) Outlines collection written by the top tier of Duke University School Of Law students.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Business Association (Duke Cox) Outlines. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Controlling Stockholder's Fiduciary Obligations A. Disputes between Classes of Shares a. Where there is a dispute between classes of shares we look at the contract rather than fiduciary duty. (Zahn v. Transamerica Corp) b. courts will

1. look at the SH agreement to see if the parties expressly contracted the alleged right

2. if not, court will determine if the right is implied-as-contracted, for reason that the parties contracted for some other express right, which would be vitiated were this right not implied. 1) Del courts will only imply contract terms when the party asserting the implication proves that the other party has acted arbitrarily or unreasonably, thereby frustrating the fruits of the bargain that the asserting party reasonably expected

3. Another theory: implied obligation of good faith: one party cannot purposefully defeat a provision of the contract that was expressly contracted for by the counterparty. B. Disclosure Obligations a. In Del. a corporation's controlling SH has a fiduciary obligation to disclose all material information when the controlling SH is asking the minority SH to act (such as by voting or manifesting consent) b. In Del., directors and officers also have such a duty of disclosure to minority SH C. Exercising Influence a. Background- three tests

1. most deferential standard: the business judgment rule. It is the default standard. The business judgment rule provides a rebuttable presumption that in making a business decision the directors of a corporation be independent, acted on an informed basis, in good faith and in the honest belief that the action taken was in the best interests of the company

2. Unocal and Revlon standards 1) When are you in the Revlon Moment?
Three situations. a) Change of Control: Effect of plan supported by bd. is to bring about a change in control of the

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Business Association (Duke Cox) Outlines.