This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Law Outlines Constitutional Law Outlines

22 Sdp Abortion Outline

Updated 22 Sdp Abortion Notes

Constitutional Law Outlines

Constitutional Law

Approximately 33 pages

This is a succinct outline of each major doctrine covered in Adler's Constitutional Law course. Each doctrine is current and presented in an attack-style paragraph format, conducive to the exam environment. A significant portion of the exam grade (and exam preparation) involves providing a detailed synopsis of the modern doctrine(s) applicable to the fact pattern(s). Each doctrine is categorized by the target of the challenge (federal or state), the source of law and common name of the doctrine, ...

Available here

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Constitutional Law Outlines. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Grounds for Challenge > In Violation of Individual Rights > Individual Rights > Abortion

Abortion: Undue Burden

The right to choose to have an abortion is a FR.

Pre-Viability: flat prohibitions on abortions are invalid, and any regulation of pre-viability abortion is invalid if it is an undue burden. A law constitutes an undue burden if its purpose or effect is to place a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion. “Purpose or effect” analysis is as follows:(1) Purpose: caselaw points to this being an objective inquiry, i.e. whether a conceivable legitimate state interest could be motivating the law. If direct or circumstantial evidence shows that the actual purpose is in fact to create a substantial obstacle, then that would also suffice to show purpose. A subjective inquiry is likely not the required threshold, however, since Congress could circumvent this prong by simply indicating expressly that its purpose was “to promote fetal health.” Legitimate state interests outlined in Carhart include (1) protecting the health of the woman and life of the fetus; (2) protecting the woman’s emotional health; (3) reducing the number of abortions; (4) and regulating the medical profession generally.

  • (2) Effect: This inquiry asks whether the regulation has the effect of creating a substantial obstacle in a large fraction of the subset of women whose behavior was in fact changed by the existence of the law, i.e. those women who would not have chosen childbirth but for the law.

  • (3) “Substantial Obstacle”: given the state’s interest in potential life and maternal health, throughout pregnancy the state may take measures to ensure the woman’s choice is informed, and such measures will not be invalidated as undue burdens as long as their purpose is to persuade the woman to choose childbirth over abortion. Only where the regulation impedes the woman’s ability to choose abortion over childbirth is there an undue burden. After Casey, per se substantial obstacles include (1) spousal notification requirements and (2) forcing a woman to choose the more dangerous method of abortion among alternatives. After Casey, per se non-substantial obstacles include (1)...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Constitutional Law Outlines.

More Constitutional Law Samples