This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Law Outlines International Law I Outlines

Foreign Sovereign Immunity Outline

Updated Foreign Sovereign Immunity Notes

International Law I Outlines

International Law I

Approximately 131 pages

...

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our International Law I Outlines. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Foreign Sovereign Immunity (JURISDICTION)

  1. The only way to get subject matter jurisdiction against a foreign sovereign state is via the exceptions codified in the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act

    1. You would still have to get personal jurisdiction against the defendant.

    2. The Alien Tort Statute WILL NOT provide for jurisdiction. Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.

  2. Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act

    1. 28 U.S.C. § 1602 - Findings and declaration of purpose

      1. The Congress finds that the determination by United States courts of the claims of foreign states to immunity from the jurisdiction of such courts would serve the interests of justice and would protect the rights of both foreign states and litigants in United States courts. Under international law, states are not immune from the jurisdiction of foreign courts insofar as their commercial activities are concerned, and their commercial property may be levied upon for the satisfaction of judgments rendered against them in connection with their commercial activities. Claims of foreign states to immunity should henceforth be decided by courts of the United States and of the States in conformity with the principles set forth in this chapter.

    2. 28 U.S.C. § 1603 - Definitions

      1. For purposes of this chapter—

        • (a) A “foreign state” . . . includes a political subdivision of a foreign state or an agency or instrumentality of a foreign state as defined in subsection (b).

        • (b) An “agency or instrumentality of a foreign state” means any entity—

          • (1) which is a separate legal person, corporate or otherwise, and

          • (2) which is an organ of a foreign state or political subdivision thereof, or a majority of whose shares or other ownership interest is owned by a foreign state or political subdivision thereof, and

          • (3) which is neither a citizen of a State of the United States as defined in section 1332 (c) and (e) of this title, nor created under the laws of any third country.

        • (c) The “United States” includes all territory and waters, continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

        • (d) A “commercial activity” means either a regular course of commercial conduct or a particular commercial transaction or act. The commercial character of an activity shall be determined by reference to the nature of the course of conduct or particular transaction or act, rather than by reference to its purpose.

        • (e) A “commercial activity carried on in the United States by a foreign state” means commercial activity carried on by such state and having substantial contact with the United States.

    3. 28 U.S.C. § 1605 - General exceptions to the jurisdictional immunity of a foreign state

      1. (a) A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case—

        • (1) in which the foreign state has waived its immunity either explicitly or by implication, notwithstanding any withdrawal of the waiver which the foreign state may purport to effect except in accordance with the terms of the waiver;

        • (2) in which the action is based upon a commercial activity carried on in the United States by the foreign state; or upon an act performed in the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere; or upon an act outside the territory of the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere and that act causes a direct effect in the United States;

          • TEST re "commercial activity": If the activity is one in which a private person could engage, it is not entitled to immunity. Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria

            • The purpose of the contract is irrelevant. Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria

          • If a government department goes into the market place of the world and buys boots or cement - as a commercial transaction - that government department should be subject to all the rules of the marketplace. Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria

        • Re "direct effect"

          • In Texas Trading, the court held that there was a direct effect in the United States, that is the financial loss occurred in the United States where (1) the suppliers (who would deliver the cement to the plaintiffs, of whom were trading companies) were to present documents and collect money in the United States, and the breaches by the defendant precluded their doing so, and (2) each of the plaintiffs were an American corporation.

          • In Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc., the Supreme Court held that Argentina's rescheduling of debt payments had a "direct effect" in the United States since New York was the place where the debts had to be repaid.

          • In Voest-Alpine Trading USA Corp. v. Bank of China, the Fifth Circuit held "that a financial loss incurred in the United States by an American plaintiff, if it is an immediate consequence of the defendant's activity, constitutes a direct effect sufficient to support jurisdiction under the third clause of the commercial activity exception to the FSIA."

          • In another case in the Fifth Circuit (Not in materials), the court held that detaining a single ship from entering a port did not constitute a direct effect (absence of one ship direct effect).

        • (3) in which rights in property taken in violation of international law are in issue and that property or any property exchanged for such property is present in the United States in connection with a commercial activity carried on in the United States by the foreign state; or that property or any property exchanged for such property is owned or operated by an agency or instrumentality of the foreign state and that agency or instrumentality is engaged in a commercial activity in the United States;

        • (4) in which rights in property in the United States acquired by succession or gift or rights in immovable property situated in the United States are in issue;

          • A lien is an interest in immovable property. India v. New York

        • ...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our International Law I Outlines.