Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Workplace Injuries And Diseases Outline

Law Outlines > Employment Law Outlines

This is an extract of our Workplace Injuries And Diseases document, which we sell as part of our Employment Law Outlines collection written by the top tier of Harvard Law School students.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Employment Law Outlines. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Workplace Injuries & Diseases A: Workers' Compensation Overview:
? Certain states exempt employers with a limited number of employees, certain industries (agriculture, state and local government), or certain occupations (e.g., household workers). Independent contractors are normally not covered.
? Four elements of a workers' comp claim: o Injury o Accident
? Sometimes construed to exclude injuries (and diseases) that develop over a long period of time o Arising Out of Employment o Occurring During the Course of Employment
? Normally requires the injury to occur on the employer's premises and during working hours
? Diseases are covered, although some courts construe the "accident" requirement to exclude them, and there are concerns with the statute of limitations and the arising out of employment test (some courts apply a "specific risk" test)
? Medical rehabilitation is likely to be provided; many states do not require vocational rehabilitation services
? Varying approaches to benefits: o Impairment Approach - rates the degree of impairment o Loss of Earning Capacity Approach - rates the loss of earning capacity resulting from the injury or disease o Actual Wage Loss Approach - pays the worker the actual loss of wages, or the loss of earning capacity, whichever is less
? Temporary disability benefits: Typically 2/3 the difference between the worker's pre-injury wage and his current earnings
? Permanent partial disability benefits: Payment based on impairment approach o Worker obtains benefits regardless whether she has actual wages o Weekly benefit is normally calculated as 2/3 of pre-injury wages
? Permanent total disability payments are paid to someone who is completely unable to work for an indefinite period o In most states, permanent total disability benefits are paid for the duration of the total disability or for life
? Death benefits are paid to the survivor of a worker killed on the job
? Employer required to pay benefits; may do so by: o Purchasing insurance from a private carrier (premiums experience rated); o Purchasing insurance from a state workers' compensation fund (premiums experience rated); or o By qualifying as a self-insurer and paying its own employees directly

Ezzy v. Workers' Comp Appeals Board: Injuries that occur as the result of off-duty recreational, social, or athletic activity are compensable under workers' comp where these activities constitute "a reasonable expectancy, or are expressly or impliedly required by, the employment."
? A reasonable expectancy exists where (1) the employee subjectively believes his participation is expected; and (2) this belief is objectively reasonable.
? The employer bears the burden of demonstrating that no subtle or indirect pressure or coercion was applied to induce involuntary participation by the employee
? Factors to consider in determining whether employee's belief that a reasonable expectancy existed was objectively reasonable: o Whether employer benefited from employee participation in the form of improved morale and camaraderie; o Whether employees were pressured to participate; o Whether the employer paid for equipment, and promoted activity during work time o Whether the employer posted notice instructing employees that the activity was not covered by workers' comp Policy Question: Should we require employers to file the workers' comp claim, so that employees do not fear retaliation? There is a formal anti-retaliation provision, but it may be hard for plaintiff to prove that she was retaliated against, and she may fear retaliation anyway. Hanson: An employee's weather-related death "arises from employment" if the employee was exposed to the risk as the result of her employment; it makes no difference if the risk was common to anyone working outdoors.
? Occupational risks (e.g., being electrocuted by a machine on the job) are always covered; neutral risks (e.g., being struck by lightening) may or may not be covered; and personal risks (e.g., heart attack), which are never covered. o Hanson involves a "neutral risk" - one that is not specific to a particular job but that is not personal to the worker.
? Prior to this case, Iowa had applied the "general public increased risk test," such that compensation was only due where the employee was exposed to conditions unusual or more intense than those experienced by the general community. o Application of this test (but not the test itself) criticized by Larson: "What does the average man, free of the obligation of any particular employment, do when it is (e.g.) twenty below zero? He does not stay outdoors all day."
? The court does not simply respond to Larson's criticism; it jettisons the general public increased risk rule entirely. The "actual risk" test covers any injury "if the nature of the employment exposes the employee to the risk." o This is more liberal than Larson's proposed rework of the general public increased risk test; Larson's rule might not cover risks faced by members of the public generally (e.g., risk of being in a car accident, risk of being struck by lightning), while the actual risk rule does cover these events as long as the employee is injured while working.

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Employment Law Outlines.