This is an extract of our Impeachment Of Witnesses document, which we sell as part of our Evidence Outlines collection written by the top tier of Oklahoma City University School Of Law students.
The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Evidence Outlines. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
IMPEACHMENT OF WITNESSES Direct Examination & Cross Examination Rule 611. Mode & Order of Interrogation & Presentation Control by the Court Ct. shall exercise reasonable control over the mode & order of interrogating witnesses so as to (1) truth
Make the interrogation & presentation effective for ascertaining the
Avoid needless time consumption
Protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrasment
Scope of Cross-Examination Limited to the subj. matter of the direct examination and matters affecting the credibility of the witness. Court can exercise discretion & allow additional inquiry on other matters Leading Questions Shouldn't be used on direct examination except as may be necessary to develop the witness's testimony. Ordinariliy leading questions shld be allowe don cross-exam. If a party calls a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified w/ an adverse party, interrogation may be by leading questions Direct Examination Normally requires the lawyer to ask questions that call for short factual answers If a question calls for a lengthy answer it is called "asking for a narrative response" and is discouraged Non leading questions are those that don't suggest an answer & are often open ended & use "who, what, where, when why, how" Cross Examination The means by which a lawyer can attack the credibility of a witness, diminish any harmful effect of the witness's direct testimony, and obtain info that may be favorable
Impeachment of a Witness It means to discredit a witness for being untruthful in some manner
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Evidence Outlines.