Hello! This is my outline for Torts, based on Best et al., Basic Tort Law: Cases, Statutes and Problems (4th ed.).
The Full Course Outline provides detailed notes and case briefs on every issue covered in the first-year torts class. It is precise and comprehensive enough to pretty much substitute for reading the textbook. Some of my friends used these notes when they hadn't done the reading and successfully relied on them to answer cold calls....
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Torts Outlines. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
*NB: this outline accords with Best et al., Basic Tort Law: Cases, Statutes and Problems (4th ed.)
Overview 1
Negligence 3
Breach 3
Standard of care 3
Hand formula 5
Special standards of care 6
Especially dangerous instrumentalities 6
Emergency 7
Below-average or superior knowledge/skill 8
Youth 8
Physical disability 9
Mental disability 10
Intoxication 11
Proving breach in general 12
Violation of a statute as proof of breach 12
Requirements 12
Specificity 12
Proof of causation 13
Licensing statutes 13
Excuses to negligence per se 13
Procedural effects of proof of violation and excuse 13
Negligence per se versus strict liability: 16
Custom 16
Industry 16
Professional standard 19
Locality rule 20
Res ipsa 20
Elements 21
But-for Cause 23
Alternative tests 24
Multiple sufficient cause, superseding cause, substantial factor 24
Restatement (Third) 24
Restatement (Second) 24
Toxic substances 25
Concert of action 25
Alternative liability, market share liability 27
Policy Limits on Liability (Palsgraf) 28
Proximate Cause 29
Directness 30
Substantial factor 30
Restatement (Second) 30
Foreseeability 32
Foreseeability in hindsight 33
Thin skull / eggshell rule 33
True value / shabby millionaire rule 34
Risk standard 34
Restatement (Third) 34
Intervening and superseding forces 34
Duty 36
Restatement (Third) Approach to Duty 36
Foreseeability 37
Special relations 37
Special duty rules 39
Rescuers 39
Negligence: Defenses 41
Plaintiff’s contributory fault 41
Contributory negligence 41
Modified comparative fault 41
Pure comparative fault 41
Fault as defense 42
Last clear chance doctrine 43
Learned Hand method of calculating 44
Assumption of risk 44
Express assumption 44
Factors for unenforceability 45
Implied assumption 46
Vicarious Liability 47
Respondeat superior 47
Tests for scope of employment 48
Intentional Torts 50
Intent generally 51
Restatement (Second) 51
Restatement (Third) 51
Subjective and objective tests for intent 51
Battery 52
Offensive contact 54
Indirect contact 54
Dual intent 55
Consent as defense 57
Self-defense as defense 58
Factors to determine reasonableness of actions 59
Defamation (libel) 60
Invasion of privacy 61
Types of privacy tort 61
Emotional distress 63
Elements of IIED 63
Outrageousness 63
Severe emotional distress 64
Recklessness 67
Reckless emotional distress 67
Restatement (Third) 67
Restatement (Second) 67
Strict Liability 68
Animals 68
Wild animals 68
Domesticated animals 69
Property damage 69
Defenses 69
Dangerous activities 71
Restatement (Second) 71
Restatement (Third) 72
Defenses 72
Strict Liability: Products Liability 74
Manufacturing defect 74
Intended result test 74
Ostensibly identical test 74
Indeterminate product defect test: 74
Design defect 78
Restatement (Second) Consumer expectation test 78
Restatement (Third) Risk-utility test 79
Choosing between CE and RU tests 79
Mandatory proof of a feasible alternative design 82
Warning defect 83
Restatement (Second) 83
Restatement (Third) 83
Defenses 84
Plaintiff’s carelessness or misuse of product 84
What is a tort?
“A tort is when harm is caused by one person or entity against another person or entity, and the law determines that a legal wrong has occurred in a way that makes it appropriate to shift the cost of the harm from the injured party to the party that caused the harm.”
Three elements: (1) harm caused, (2) legal wrong, (3) appropriate to shift
Four categories of torts:
Negligence
Intentional torts
Recklessness
Strict liability
What does tort law signal?
Notion of equity
Deterrence
Desirable norms of conduct
Civil law | Criminal | |
---|---|---|
General purpose | Private individuals, one harmed and one who caused the harm. The question is who should bear the cost. Although there are societal issues at stake because of what tort law signals, it is generally speaking between two private individuals. | Society identifies things that should be subject to a certain kind of punishment. |
Case brought by | Plaintiff or representative of person harmed | Government |
Decision | Usually decided by judge; sometimes jury | Jury; judge determined legal rules |
Standard of proof | Preponderance of evidence; more likely than not. | Beyond a reasonable doubt |
Remedy | Usually monetary | Usually incarceration; limits on freedom; death |
Litigation | ADR (private arbitration) | ADR (mediation) | |
---|---|---|---|
Decision makers | Judge or jury | Arbitrator | Parties |
Basis for decision | Legal principles | Whatever the parties decide is the basis | Whatever the parties decide is the basis |
Procedures | FRCP | Whatever the parties decide is the basis | Whatever the parties decide is the basis |
Precedents | Follow and create precedents | Needn’t follow precedents, unless parties agreed | Needn’t follow precedents, unless parties agreed |
Role of law | Principles | Determined by parties’ agreement | Determined by parties’ agreement |
Appealable | Yes | No | Not applicable |
Formalist v. Realist approach to tort law:
Formalist
Judges are well-versed in the law. Legal principles are discernable, and their application to fact patterns is predictable and reasonable.
Realist
Judges are human. Although socialized in principle, they may bring their human experience to bear on deciding cases, so outcomes are not so predictable.
Concepts of reasonableness, deterrence, equity and others relate to the formalist/realist debate.
Sources of tort law:
Tort law tends to be dominated by common law.
Statutes is next.
Common law on the statutes.
Restatement (Second) and Restatement (Third). Second is more common.
Alternative dispute resolution:
Although many terms are determined by contract, deference to arbitral institutions is increasingly common. One example is American Arbitration Association (AAA). These provide models for resolutions of different types of disputes.
Elements of negligence: plaintiff may recover damages after showing, by a preponderance of evidence,
Defendant (1) owed the plaintiff a duty to act in a certain way
...
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Torts Outlines.
Hello! This is my outline for Torts, based on Best et al., Basic Tort Law: Cases, Statutes and Problems (4th ed.).
The Full Course Outline provides detailed notes and case briefs on every issue covered in the first-year torts class. It is precise and comprehensive enough to pretty much substitute for reading the textbook. Some of my friends used these notes when they hadn't done the reading and successfully relied on them to answer cold calls....
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get Started