Law Outlines Criminal Procedure: Investigations Outlines
This is an outline for criminal procedure investigations. It covers the Fourth Amendment and Fifth Amendment. ...
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Criminal Procedure: Investigations Outlines. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
Exclusionary rule: what happens when the 4th amen is violated?
Rule: Evidence obtained in violation of 4th amen cannot be used as evidence in a (federal) criminal prosecution
Protection of the 4th amen is of no value unless we exclude evidence obtained in violation of the 4th amen
Weeks: ran a lottery through the mail and found evidence in his house without a search warrant
Applies to the states because it is a constitutional rule (Mapp v Ohio: lewd books and pics)
Three justifications
Deterrence—lever to deter police misconduct because other remedies are illusory
Example—courts and judicial administration need to teach people importance of the law and respect of the law
Judicial integrity—something disreputable about the courts relying on unconstitutionally obtained evidence
Old rule (Wolf v Colorado)
Exclusionary rule is a matter of judicial implication
Scope of exclusionary rule
Fruit of the poisonous tree is excluded; must be fruit of YOUR tree; bars physical material obtained during or as a direct result of unconstitutional invasion
Wong Sun:
Toy made statement when he was arrested after police entered his home in violation of 4th amen, police then discovered heroine; both statement and heroine are fruit and excluded
Wong Sun’s statement is admissible; he was arrested illegally but then he voluntarily came back; heroine can also be used against him there was no violation of his 4th amen rights in seizing the heroine (standing)
EXCEPTIONS: exclusion is the last resort
Attenuation
So attenuated as to dissipate the taint (Wong Sun)
If chain of consequences is too remote
Convictions finalized before Mapp
Impeachment of testifying D (Walder)
Exclusionary rule still applies if evidence is used to impeach witness other than D
Don’t like the idea of defendants being given a license to perjure themselves
No additional deterrent necessary, evidence has already been excluded for other purposes
Independent source
Allows admission of evidence that has been discovered by means wholly independent of any constitutional violation
Inevitable discovery (hypothetical)
Allows admission of evidence that would have been discovered anyways through legal means
Nix v Williams: Christian burial speech, girl’s body would have been discovered by search team
Rationale
Don’t want to put the prosecution in a worse position based on the police violation
Don’t want police to profit from the illegality, so put them in the same position as if the violation had not occurred
Preponderance of the evidence
Nexus
Need a nexus between the kind of violation at issue and the suppression of the evidence or else evidence is admissible
New York v Harris: police violated Payton but confession was made in stationhouse; Payton protects physical integrity of the home...
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Criminal Procedure: Investigations Outlines.
This is an outline for criminal procedure investigations. It covers the Fourth Amendment and Fifth Amendment. ...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get Started