This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Law Outlines Torts Outlines

Damages Outline

Updated Damages Notes

Torts Outlines

Torts

Approximately 66 pages

Torts notes with all cases briefed ...

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Torts Outlines. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Damages

compensatory

“out-of-pocket”

lost wages
medical costs

single recovery

  • one-time recovery, no future awards

  • easier to do administratively but harder to predict whether the award will be sufficient.

future loss

npv (riverway)

general (“non-pecuniary”)

pain + suffering

loss of enjoyment

awarded separately? (McDougald)

why?

“compensation” (McDougald)
deterrence
pseudo-U.K. rule

limitations on general damages

additur

remittitur

statutory ceilings

comparable cases (Duncan)

collateral source rule

justifications (Harding)

subrogation

wrongful death

beneficiary’s action/damages

defenses vs. decedent + beneficiary

survival actions

Damages suffered by decedent

medical/p+s
all econ. losses in some states

-punitive

why? (Kemezy)

standard

recklessness
knowledge of particular danger
calculation re: likelihood of liability

due process limit (State Farm)

(1) degree of reprehensibility
(2) disparity between harm suffered and punitive award
(3) diff. between punitive award and civil damages in comparable cases

Defenses + Limited Duty

contributory neg.

complete defense (Butterfield)

causal showing required! (Gyerman)
justification?
Harshness, and consequent reluctance (Beems)

exceptions

d’s breach of safety statute
intentional tort

comparative neg.

“pure” vs. modified

negligence vs. causation

based on what?
jury/judge must assign percentages

why comparative vs. contributory?

Defenses + Limited Duty

assumption of risk

express

implied

conscious taking of unreasonable risk (Murphy?)
conscious taking of reasonable risk (Murphy?)

pure emotional loss

common law bar

impact rule

zone of danger

Dillon rule

(1) physical proximity
(2) temporal proximity
(3) relationship

Defenses + Limited Duty

duty of rescue

common law – very limited

def. causes the danger
direct risk creation (Montgomery)
reliance
special relationship
landlord-tenant, psychiatrist-patient (Tarasoff)
Requires visible risk
Landowners
invitees: reas. care
licensees: warn of hidden dangers only
trespassers: no wanton injury
exception: attractive nuisance

Products Liability

Historical development

Contractual privity (Winterbottom)

Effacement of privity rule -- imminent or inherent dangerousness (Thomas v. Winchester)

Negligence (McPherson)

Elimination of privity rule
Contemporaneous development of warranty theory

Rise of SL

Elaboration of warranty theory

Liability of immediate seller
Liability past immediate seller for impure food

Escola (Traynor concurrence) -- justifications for SL

SL via warranty (Henningsen)

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Torts Outlines.